User talk:Wikinaut

earthquake prediction

This discussion is referring to User:Wikinaut/Moon-Earthquake-Theory, 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, 2005_Sumatran_Earthquake and Earthquake prediction.

Wikinaut, please don't add User:Wikinaut/Moon-Earthquake-Theory material to 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake or Earthquake prediction. There is no scientific consensus that astrology based methods can predict earthquakes. Furthermore, regarding the alleged prediction by Indian scientists, there is no mention of this in the general news media, apart from the one article in an Indian newspaper ([1]). There needs to be confirmation that such a prediction actually took place; so far there is none. -- Curps 03:59, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

There are more references, see my permanently updated page and please study the older scientific papers in the second, more generally reference section -print them and study them, please. --Wikinaut 07:40, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wikinaut, you need to provide proof that these guys actually made the prediction they claim to have made. You need to provide a reference to some magazine article or newspaper or Usenet newsgroup posting or something that constitutes a clear public publication of their prediction and proof that this prediction was made before the event and not after it. Anyone can pretend to have made a successful prediction, we need to see proof that they actually did so.

If this can't be provided, the whole claim of prediction is unsupported. Please don't try to add the material back unless you can provide a footnoted reference or link to where this alleged prediction was published.

I have looked at the links you posted, and there is no satisfactory proof of any kind. Supposedly a report was presented on December 22 to the "Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi"... this is very vague. Was this the department of some university, and if so, why is no university named?

-- Curps 08:19, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Why have the big reputable Indian newspapers not picked up on this story? Say the Times of India for instance. Does the University of Madras geology department endorse or support these guys (I don't know, the university website seems to be down)?

I think the story about an alleged prediction is simply not credible. -- Curps 08:26, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I have also found this http://www.12thharmonic.com/wordpress/index.php?p=577 about their publication in the 12hharmony blog, which was copied by someone not me from http://astroturf . uni. cc/ (read this too) to that blog. I am not a blogger, so I did not know, how to use or trakc these blogs - I found the 12hharmony posting by a google search yesterday. --Wikinaut 08:28, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I agree with you, that we need some proof, that they really have sent to USGS and NASA and the others. But the published article "Planetary constellation.." was published in spring of 2004. --Wikinaut 08:30, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wikinaut,

Sorry for not replying sooner. You say you have a copy of the letter that those guys claim to have sent to the USGS and NASA and others. But with no acknowledgement from USGS and NASA that they received such a letter, there is a big problem with knowing if it is genuine or not. -- Curps 08:53, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

---

Thirteen years later (and Curps is long gone), but in light of your recent edit here I will again ask you: please don't add User:Wikinaut/Moon-Earthquake-Theory material – or links to it – to any article. Your theory is entirely fringe, and does not belong on Wikipedia in any place. Ping me if you have questions. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I support you Wikinaut !

Knowing Curps and his protective nature on his site, I fully empathise with you as Curps has been unkind to me too. kenkam 04:32, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Rb

Template:Rb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Kimchi.sg 12:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Gb

Template:Gb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Kimchi.sg 12:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Sofa Pic

Don't forget to clean up the image description :) use {{information}} Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Herbert Mataré

Hi, Could you please provide a citation for the fact that Herbert Mataré is deceased? Per Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living people, uncited material on the pages of living (or possibly living) people must be removed so, without it, we cannot allow notice of his death to remain on the page. -- SchreyP ^(messages) 17:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Dem Support-Team liegt unter Ticket:2011092210019198 ein Scan der Todesanzeige vor

Hi Wikinaut, thanks for the update. I have requested on WP:BLPN#Herbert Mataré to check the ticket and if this is enough to allow his article to be updated accordingly. -- SchreyP ^(messages) 19:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Bug reported for ownCloud android app

Hi, I don't know if you are the same Wikinaut who has reported a few bugs on GitHub for the Android app for ownCloud, but that user has no contact info in their GitHub profile so this seems to be my next best hope. I just wanted to tell you that my experiences with the trunk/development version of the Android app have been very bad (I can't speak about the server, I've never used anything but the latest patched stable version). What's more, as the app has been further "developed" in the last month in particular, it's only gotten worse. I have been maintaining my own fork on Gitorious, and I worked on it extensively during the month of June, and got it vaguely to where I wanted it and to where it didn't have stupid crashes and bugs in it. A week or so ago I tried to merge the upstream development into my fork, and ended up failing miserably. After I tried doing that, I tried using a pristine copy of upstream, which has only gotten worse. I have tried reporting a few bugs regarding the most egregious errors in the app (such as the fact that, until a few days ago, you couldn't re-download updated files from the server), to make the merge burden on my fork lighter and generally be a good open source citizen, but of the three bugs I reported, two have been ignored and the third the developer claimed that he had fixed when he had not. I've more or less decided to maintain my fork mostly independently and stop bothering with upstream, given the caliber of code that has come out of there recently and their attitude towards bugs filed.

If you are interested, my fork is on Gitorious, and my username is ~andrewjamesbarr. I make no promises, but at least for now, it seems to be doing what I need it to do. 24.58.147.197 (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes. You can contact me personally by mail. --Wikinaut (talk) 15:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:The Wikinauts on Seriphos.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Wikinauts on Seriphos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wikinaut. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wikinaut. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wikinaut. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Tidal triggering of earthquakes. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rb

Template:Rb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)